Tuesday, 28 October 2025

The West losing its grip on technology

 

Image...a nuclear powered airplane

By Mike Smith

28th October 2025

Russia just tested their Burevestnik nuclear powered missile on the 21 October 2025. It flew about 14,000 km over 15 hours without refuellingand could probably have flown ten times as far and as long if it wanted to.

Trump’s response was that Putin should rather try to make peace in Ukraine instead of testing rockets.

I am more interested in how it will impact the world as we know/knew it.

Back in the days of SA Sucks, I had a hard time convincing one of our more leftist  groupies that “Peak Oil” was a myth. She was so fixated and brainwashed by the likes of Al Gore that she honestly believed the fear-mongering rubbish that oil was a zero sum and that we were going to run out of it.

She believed the crap they teach kids at school that millions of years ago dead plants and animals were covered by soil, and with weight, time and pressure it somehow magically tuned all of it into oil and some into coal and that is where oil comes from that we pump out of the earth today.

Simple mathematics will show you that we never had enough plants and animals in the history of the earth to have given us the amount of oil we have consumed in the last 150 years. Besides, oil wells in Texas that were pumped empty, empty, empty 100 years ago are full again today. Where is all of that oil coming from?

The truth is, of course, that although oil is a hydro carbon it does not have a biological origin. Researching the abiotic origin of crude oil will lead you to the fact that oil is a byproduct of volcanic reaction and we will NEVER run out of it.

But people are not supposed to know this, because then you cannot keep the price of oil artificially high…and that is the crux of the matter. Oil on earth is controlled by a monopoly (OPEC, led by the royal house of Saudi Arabia) who decide at will when and how much they will increase and decrease pumping of said oil. Small independent oil producers like Norway do not really feature.

That is the downside of capitalism...when it leads to monopoly capitalism.

But who needs oil in the first place when there are better engines available than the antiquated internal combustion engines?

“Where?”, you ask.

The cars, trucks, busses, trains, tractors, etc running on the Diesel and Otto cycles are presented to us as if there are no alternatives. Truth is, the principals of internal combustion engines running on hydrocarbon fuel have not really changed since 150 years. Sure you have electronic valve control and electronic injection control, but in the end it is still “suck-squeeze-bang-push”…like in the days of pioneers such as Dr Rudolf Diesel and Dr. Nick Otto.

The same can be said for gas turbines and jet engines running on the Joule cycle or Brayton cycle.

Little do people know, that they are being sold a lie…many lies, in fact. Electronic vehicles are not real alternatives and just distractions and there is no need to burn hydrocarbon fuels such as petrol, diesel or kerosene (paraffin) in our engines.

In 1957 Ford had a nuclear powered concept car called the "NUCLEON". A model of it is in the Technical Museum in Berlin, Germany.

Ford Nucleon.

I always wondered what would happen when people finally woke up and realised that plane tickets could be free. Shipping containers on ships and trains could be free. You could drive your car for 50 years and never refuel.

Molten-salt reactors, also known as Lithium-salt or Thorium-salt reactors, have been around for decades. The technology is not new. It has been out since the 1950’s, at least. I am talking about nuclear reactors so small that you can run a car on it or fly a plane with it. And they are perfectly safe and clean. Why is it that nobody ever heard of them until Putin fitted one to a loitering missile?

You’ve been had. You’ve been lied to.

As far back as 1901, when Nikola Tesla built his Wardenclyffe tower and wanted to give the world free energy, he realised that it was not enough to be super intelligent. The development of technology was dependent on those who controlled the money...by greedy investors such as J.P. Mogan and his son Jack who did not care one bit for the wellbeing of the people of the world, but who rather wanted a return on investment.

Tesla developed a death ray that he called a “defensive weapon” that would end all wars…no investors. They would rather invest in nuclear weapons. Tesla died a broken man. A poor man…knowing that those with money do not have the best interests of humanity in mind.

Developing technology needs money. Scientists, engineers, technicians need to be paid. Workshops and laboratories need money to set up and run. If there are no investors, the technology will not be developed. Simple as that.

However, things are changing. I am not saying that Putin has the best interest of humanity at heart, but he has shown humanity that they have been duped.

People will now start asking questions, because the West also had this technology in the 1950’s. They called it Project Pluto. It was abandoned around 1964 when I remember correctly.

In other words we could have had cars and trucks and airplanes running on perfectly safe and 100% clean nuclear energy for at least the last 50 years. Hell, we could have been on Mars and beyond already, but no…better to keep people dependent on a lie of “Fossil” fuels and enslaved for decades than to give the world free transport.

I see the Western propaganda machine is already kicking in making out as if Putin’s missiles will contaminate the environment with radioactivity, but as I mentioned, these molten-salt reactors are perfectly safe, have zero nuclear fallout and zero nuclear waste.

Be prepared for the future.

Tuesday, 7 October 2025

Ten lessons from 1984

 


By Mike Smith

08th of October 2025

Not sure who wrote this below, but I thought I would share it. We did this book in school and I remember my teacher asking us if we could think of any country that is like Oceania in 1984 and we all answered, East Germany, Cuba, Russia...actually what he was trying to do was to make us look at our own country, see the signs and make sure it never happened to us. Well, we are living 1984 today.

-------------

10 lessons from the book “Nineteen Eighty-Four”

1. Truth can be manipulated.
When those in power control information, they control reality itself. If history is rewritten, people can be made to forget what was once true.

2. Language shapes thought.
Orwell’s concept of Newspeak shows how limiting words can limit freedom. If people cannot name rebellion or justice, they may not be able to imagine them.

3. Surveillance destroys freedom.
“Big Brother is watching you” warns us that constant monitoring strips away privacy, individuality, and trust.

4. Fear is a tool of control.
The Party rules not through love or loyalty but through fear, punishment, and terror, which keeps citizens obedient.

5. Conformity can crush individuality.
Winston and Julia’s attempt to love and think freely shows how hard it is to resist a system that demands total conformity.

6. Propaganda replaces reality.
Endless slogans (“War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength”) illustrate how repetition can make people accept contradictions.

7. Totalitarianism erases humanity.
The Party’s ultimate goal is not just obedience but domination of the human mind—destroying even private loyalties and emotions.

8. Freedom begins in thought.
Winston’s rebellion starts with the simple idea: “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two makes four.” Independent thought is the first step toward resistance.

9. Power seeks power for its own sake.
As O’Brien tells Winston, the Party doesn’t care about justice or progress; it wants power only to keep and expand power.

10. Complacency is dangerous.
Orwell’s warning is timeless: If people ignore abuses of power, they may gradually accept surveillance, censorship, and manipulation as “normal.”

Israel making the world a better place; one terrorist organisation at a time

 


By Mike Smith

08th of October 2025

What a week for Israel. Libtarded Greta Thunberg got kicked out of Israel, Trump wants to pressure Netanyahu into a deal with Hamas and yesterday we saw the remembrance of that terrible day in 2023 when Hamas terrorists attacked Israeli civilians at a music concert killing 1400 innocent people and taking 250 hostages.

Amazing how you see idiots, even South Africans, on a flotilla protesting against Israel and supporting Hamas in the Medi, but no one protesting what Hamas did on the 7th of October 2023. Same in the UK, Germany and Sweden…pro-Hamas, anti -Israel demos everywhere.

Thus begs the question in my mind…Has the world gone mad? Seriously, can people not see the wood for the trees anymore?

The last time I saw something similar to this madness was during Apartheid in South Africa in the 1970’s and 1980’s when the whole world stood against a pro-western, white, Christian minority and supported Marxist terrorist scum such as the ANC, PAC and SWAPO…terrorists who attacked civilians on farm roads, in country clubs, shopping centres and Wimpy bars.

In fact, back in those days when the whole world had boycotts and sanctions against us, Israel was probably our only true friend. Oh, how I miss those days! Kids playing “Blikaspaai”, “Kennetjie” and “Wolf-wolf-hoe-laat-is-dit” in the streets until ten o’clock at night. We were still kids. Carefree, happy, full of energy and laughter.

I don’t think kids today know these games anymore. They are too preoccupied with their images on Instagram and their videos on Tik-Tok. We didn’t have Tik-tok; we had Tok-tokkie and the only “social media” picture we had to worry about was the school’s group photo of the class for that year…”Kyk Pietie, jy lyk soos ‘n doos.”

Great times, but those great times came at a cost. A cost that we as kids were not always aware of. It was an invisible hand of safety that watched over us and ensured, that we as kids, could grow up having a carefree childhood.

Back on the Namibian border we had soldiers, our brothers and uncles, fighting the scourge of Marxist terrorists. Inside South Africa we had the police and security police, rounding the ANC and PAC terrorists up. Our intelligence services were hunting the bastards down wherever they were hiding, London, Maputo, Dar es-Salaam…

Back then South Africa showed the world how to deal with terrorists.

There is only one way; you have to beat them at their own game. You have to terrorise the terrorists into submission. You have to finish the job, because if you leave one bastard standing he will claim a victory and start all over again.

That was our mistake. We thought we won. We won the war in Angola. The ANC was so beaten and subdued that they were just a fax machine in an empty office in Dar es-Salaam…and then…just before we could finish the job, the world wanted us to make a deal.

We should never have made that deal in 1993. Look who is in charge of South Africa today. Look how our children don’t play on the streets anymore…laugh anymore.

Therefore, I, for one, do not support Trump’s “deal” on Gaza. At least not until Israel has finished the job.

If Israel leaves one Hamas bastard standing, he will claim a victory and start all over again and in two years’ time you will have rockets raining down on Israeli suburbs and ragheads exploding themselves on Israeli school busses again.

No, Israel has the opportunity now to finish the job and draw a line under Hamas. Wipe them all out…to the last man, flatten Gaza and start over again. The world will be a better place, I tell you.

“But what about the innocent Palestinians?”, they cry.

There are no innocent Palestinians. In 2006 Israel warned them not to vote for terrorist organisations such as Hamas and Fatah…what did the Palestinians do? They voted for Hamas and Fatah… More than 90%. So they mustn’t cry now and plead innocence. Democracy was wasted on them.

And when Israel is finished with Hamas, they should carry on with Hezbollah. Wipe them all out.

Go Israel! Make the world a better place; one terrorist organisation at a time…and please remember, South Africa does not support Hamas; the ANC regime does. There is a big difference.

Sunday, 5 October 2025

Ten things I reject about the New (Improved) South Africa

 By Mike Smith

October 2025

 

Number 1 - The Flag – 

Designed by Frederick Gordon Brownell (1940-2019),


State Herald, at the time and a Vexillologist (Flag expert) and adopted on 27 April 1994. A few years earlier he also designed the Namibian Flag, another piece of shit that makes me want to puke when I see it..

Nevertheless, It is not a symbol of unity and a new beginning.

Both Frederick Brownell and the Government at the time insisted that the six colours meant NOTHING…Yes right…The ANC colours dawning over and replacing the red white and blue found in the Dutch, British and French flags. From the first time I saw it, it symbolised the ANC’s desire of replacing white South Africans of European heritage by their own supporters. After 30 years, it is still their desire. They still sing about killing whites and chasing whites out of the country. They still have policies of land theft and replacing whites with blacks in every sphere of society.

In the early 1990’s a new SA flag was needed and the NP government at the time launched a competition. Despite more than 7000 designs submitted, to give it an aura of democracy, none was accepted. With elections looming in April 1994, Frederick Brownell stepped in. It was a hurried sketch made less than a month before the elections…and frankly, it shows. The New SA Flag is ugly. Too many colours that reminds one of kotch in a tumble drier. Others say it looks like Winnie Mandela’s G-string.

Honestly, I do not know how Frederick Brownell became a Vexillologist, but fuck me, a retarded four year old could have done a better job with a box of crayons on a piece of canvas.

It was initially approved as an INTERIM flag, intended to be used only for five years until a permanent one was chosen. By 1996 it was adopted as the permanent flag in the constitution

Number 2 - The National Coat of Arms

The design process started in in 1999 when the


Department of Arts and Culture asked the public to provide ideas. As with the flag, the ideas were rejected and eventually, to be ready for the 27 April 2000 (Freedom Day) celebrations, they called in the white Baas and it was designed on the fly by Iaan Bekker and Bertus Pienaar.

The designers got everything wrong. The current New (improved) Coat of Arms is so bad that not a single South African can feel represented by it.

The Khoi-Khoi people mostly died out in three devastating smallpox epidemics at the Cape in the 18th and 19th century in which also 75% of the whites died.. Along with them died out their languages and culture. The rest integrated with other nations such as Malay and whites at the Cape and became known as Cape Coloureds. They speak mostly Pidgin Afrikaans and/or English. Some of the San (Bushmen) still live in Namibia and Botswana and mostly speak Afrikaans. Ironically their language was written down and captured on vinyl in the 1920 by whites from England (BBC) and had to be retaught to them in the 1950’s-1970’s.

The Knobkerrie, spear and shield were not Khoi-San weapons. They design of the shield is not that of any indigenous tribe of South Africa. Rather a European knight shield. The spear is more a Roman spear than an assegai. The ears of wheat…wheat was bought to South Africa by the Dutch farmers. It is not the staple food of Blacks…which is corn, which was brought to Africa from South America by white colonialists in the 16th century. Blacks were pastoral nomads and Khoi-San were hunter gatherers. They never planted wheat in South Africa. To this day, wheat is found in the Western Cape. Up north and East you can find corn.

Black, white Indian and other South Africans are not represented in the Coat of Arms at all.

 

Number 3 - The national anthem 

Nkosi Sik’lele ‘iAfrika (“LORD, bless Africa”) was


composed in 1897 as a spiritual song by a Christian convert, Enoch Sontonga. He was a teacher at the Methodist Missionary School in Nancefield, Johannesburg. The melody was stolen from the psalm ‘Aberystwyth’ by Joseph Parry, and Sontonga adapted it to unite Western and African musical styles. The song was formally recorded in London in 1923 and the lyrics published in a Presbyterian songbook in 1927. In Zulu, Nkosi means: master, chief, king, or lord. 

Sorry, but the Heathen god Nkosi, is not my God, the Almighty of Heaven and Earth.

In fact when Nkosi Sik’lele ‘iAfrika was combined with "Die Stem" (The Voice of South Africa) reference to our Biblical/Christian God was removed and replaced with eucumenical rubish such as "let us live and strive for freedom, in South Africa our dear land".

Why strive for freedom? Didn't you get your freedom in 1994 already?

No, for me there will only ever be one Anthem of South Africa and that is Die Stem van Suid Afrika. A beautiful song about the beauty of the country.

Number 4 - The Constitution and the Bill of rights

People tend to think that a constitution and or


Bill of Rights is a document that the Government gives to the people telling them what their basic rights are in a country. Nothing could be further from the truth! WE, THE PEOPLE tell government what our rights are, and their job, in fact their ONLY job, is to defend those rights. Not to build schools or roads or whatever…Government’s ONLY job in a democracy is to defend our individual rights, because a democracy is not about subjecting to the will of the majority, but to protect the rights of a minority and the smallest minority is the individual.

Unfortunately not in South Africa. The interim constitution of 1993 and the final constitution of 1996 were almost singlehandedly written by Communist Joe Slovo. Sure there were people who gave a few insights such as Arthur Chaskalson, Hassen Ibrahim, Albie Sachs, Kader Asmal, Dullah Omar, and a whole list of other Marxist terrorist scum at the Multi-Party Negotiating Forum (MPNF) and CODESA (Convention for a Democratic South Africa) talks between 1990 and 1993, but Joe Slovo had by far the biggest input and is well remembered for his “Sunset Clauses”.

After the 1994 elections, the Constitutional Assembly, made of 490 politicians from across the board drafted and adopted the permanent constitution.

Therefore, the constitution was not drawn up BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE. It was drawn up by a bunch of libtarded leftist Marxist scum.

Besides, the ANC has shown over the years that they feel nothing for the rights of the people. A simple constitutional right as access to sufficient food and clean water (27.1(b))…there you have the ANC consistently adopting policies that prevent farmers from ensuring food security. It is as if the ANC has declared war on farmers and want people to starve. Water…there you have towns like Parys in the freestate, right next to the Vaal river, the second largest river in the country…going without water for days. Same with the people of Howick next to uMngeni river and the beautiful Howick water falls in Natal…days without water.

The ANC is constantly undermining Afrikaner rights to own schools, own universities and practicing there right to freedom of association.

But my all time favourite is Sections 9. (3) and  9.(5) on Equality and discrimination…”The state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.

(5)Discrimination on one or more of the grounds listed in subsection (3) is unfair unless it is established that the discrimination is fair”.

You cannot make this shit up unless you are a retarded ANC Communist crook.

In other words…All forms of discrimination by the state is unfair unless that discrimination is aimed against WHITES, then it is OK…then it is “FAIR”.

Therefore we have organizations like the Institute of Race Relations (IRR) and the South African Institute of Racial Law (SAIRL) indicating that there are approximately 142 operative racial laws in South Africa.

South Africa is NOT an equal society. You have state instituted racial laws and quotas benefitting the black majority and discriminating against other racial minorities.

To say that whites are second class citizens in South Africa is not true. According to Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment, coloureds and Indians are second class citizens; Whites are Third class citizens in South Africa!

Therefore, for as long as those discriminatory laws are in the South African constitution, I shall reject it with the contempt it deserves.

 

Number 5 - The ANC as a legitimate government

The National Party had no mandate to govern,


let alone negotiate with anybody at CODESA 1 & 2 after they scrapped the Population registration act and two days later the group areas act.

South Africa’s Population Registration Act of 1950 — the law that required every South African to be classified by race at birth — was formally repealed on 28 June 1991 by the Population Registration Act Repeal Act, No. 114 of 1991.

This lead to one of the greatest political paradoxes of the time, because from that moment on all citizens were equal and had equal rights. The whites who voted the NP into power only made up about 10% of the population at the time and the NP had no mandate to govern anymore and should have called an election. Instead they relied on the political ignorance of the (mostly white) public and  carried on as if they were still legitimately in charge. The NP argued it still had the legal authority to govern during talks, while the ANC and others accepted this as a temporary arrangement to avoid a collapse of the state. CODESA (Convention for a Democratic South Africa) was precisely about moving from this illegitimate but legal NP rule to a legitimate, inclusive democracy.

One man knew it and called them out. Jaap Marais of a small party called the HNP. Jaap Marais was a lawyer, just like FW de Klerk. He knew the truth. Jaap Marais was a very intelligent man who, amongst other things, translated Shakespeare into Afrikaans.

Therefore De Klerk sought new legitimacy by calling a whites only referendum (March 1992) to get the whites to support the NP as their main negotiators.

That act alone tells you that they had no legitimacy and no mandate and they knew it, because if they did, it would have been self-evident and it wouldn’t have been necessary to call a referendum to get legitimacy and/or a mandate that they supposedly already had, wouldn’t it?

They had no right to do that. They should have simply laid down the reigns on the 28th of June 1991 and should have stepped down. Finished.

-  De jure (legal): NP was from that moment on no more the lawful government under SA’s Tri-cameral 1983 constitution which excluded the 80% majority of the population.

-  De facto (political/moral): They had no real mandate from 90% of the country’s population, which is why the ANC, PAC, and others never accepted them as a legitimate government — only as a negotiating partner.

The ANC was founded as a liberation movement, not as a political party and it established its armed wing, “uMkhonto we Sizwe” on 16 December 1961. The founders were: Nelson Mandela – first commander-in-chief, Joe Slovo (of the South African Communist Party, SACP), Joe Modise (later became long-time MK commander and Minister of Defence),  Walter Sisulu, Govan Mbeki and Raymond Mhlaba. All Marxists terrorists and as for Joe Modise, a double agent and gangster (Spoilers Gang) who, amongst other things, ran a stolen car operation between South Africa and Zambia.

All these organisations that the NP “negotiated” with were banned Marxist terrorist organisations. The SA Communist Party was banned in 1950, the ANC and PAC banned in 1960 and uMkhonto we Sizwe, banned in 1961.

The ANC was put on the US terrorist watchlists in the 1980’s and only taken off when on the 1st of July 2008, President George W. Bush signed a bill that finally removed Nelson Mandela and other ANC leaders from the U.S. terrorist watch lists.

De Klerk, being an executive president (dictator) with a mandate of only 10% of the population, unilaterally unbanned the SACP, ANC (MK) and the PAC (APLA) at the opening of parliament on the 2nd of February 1990. As a president he could legally do it, but he had no political legitimacy.

Dr. Andries Treurnicht, of the Conservative Party accused De Klerk of surrendering to terrorists. Jaap Marais of the HNP completely rejected it saying that whites had voted the NP into power to protect apartheid, not dismantle it. Marais declared that the NP government was now illegitimate, because it had surrendered to Marxism and to black majority politics.

And that, dear reader, was the crux of the matter. FW de Klerk’s unbanning of the organisations on the 2nd of February 1990 was a De Facto surrender, everything that followed after that was just smoke-and-mirrors to give it some legitimacy. The referendum and negotiations at CODESA was a con job that just sprayed a bit of legitimacy perfume on a stinking carcass in the middle of the room...and people fell for it.

Through the Referendum, De Klerk, with the aid of the National Intelligence Agency, CIA and MI6 neutralised, the moderate Conservative Party, marginalised the ultra-right AWB and HNP as “fringe” looneys and used the military to keep them in check, played, propogandised and used the media to unite the liberal Afrikaners and English whites to support him and took money from Big Mining, Big Business, Big Finance, etc to lie and reassure the white South Africans that nothing would change and all will be well.

Fact is that everything that happened after 28 June 1992, all the referendums, negotiations and every single election were illegal.

As for the ANC currently:

Look at the ANC today…state capture, cadre deployment, and widespread corruption lead some to argue that the ANC squandered any legitimacy it once had.

Number 6 - All the ANC policies such as AA, BEE, BBBEE, Quotas in sport, university entry, Freedom charter, etc.

The ANC showed through BEE, Affirmative Action,


racial quotas in sport and university entry, etc that they care ZERO for minority rights, therefore betraying their much championed new constitution. ANC rule is a tyranny of the majority; not a democracy.



Number 7 - The new provinces and borders

At the Codesa negotiations prior to 1994 the NP and Inkhata were pushing for a federal system, but as we know the Communists won and the four provinces of the Union/Republic of South Africa and the ten homelands/Bantustans were reorganised into nine provinces. This was to break the power and claim of the Boers on their former independent countries of the ZAR/Transvaal and Orange Freestate, the possible future independence of the British Colonial Cape and Natal colonies or heaven forbid, a strong independent Zulu Kingdom of KwaZulu. I refuse to acknowledge the ANC’s splitting up of South Africa. I still talk about the Transvaal, Western-Transvaal, Eastern Transvaal, etc. In the future, we shall restore all those old names and provinces.



Number 8 - Name Changes

Run under the South African Geographical Names


Council (SAGNC)
headed by Affirmative Action employee and doctoral candidate Ms. Palesa Kadi and working for the Ministry of Sports, Arts and Culture (Minister Gayton McKenzie), these clowns are responsible for changing place names in South Africa and the cost going along with it. Not only the names of towns, suburbs, cities and municipalities, but also street names, river names, names of dams, names of mountains, National Parks (like Kruger), etc. and every time a name is changed it needs to be changed on maps around the world, paper and electronic. To give you an idea, when Swaziland recently changed their name to eSwatini replacing signage, rebranding, and map updates were estimated at US$ 6 million. You have Signage (roads, boundary signs, municipal buildings), Updating municipal records, legal/administrative, Map updates (local, regional, national), Business / private sector (printing, address changes, marketing), and other Miscellaneous stuff like communications, contingencies, etc. You are talking anything from $500,00 to well over $1 million for the change of one town’s name in South Africa and the ANC has changed a LOT! According to the records of the SAGNC themselves, as of 2024, 1,505 geographical features have been officially renamed or had their names standardised under the SAGNC. Of those, 85 are towns/cities that have had name changes. You do the numbers. It is a total waste of money. How many schools could you have built with all that money? How many hospitals, old age homes, etc?

Apart from that, the name changes are ALWAYS a one way street; From an English or Afrikaans name to a Black name. Never the other way around. It is cultural and historical genocide. The eradication of any and all Dutch and British colonial or Boer heritage.

To this day I refuse to acknowledge any of these name changes. I believe that those who built it get to name it. It is Not Mokopane; it’s Potgietersrus. It’s not Makhado; it’s Louis Trichardt. It’s not Mookgophong; it’s Naboomspruit. It is not Gqeberha; It’s Port Elizabeth. It’s not Qonce; It’s King Williams Town…always was and always will be.

There is of course a very sinister psychological game being played here by the Marxist terrorist ANC as we have seen recently with their proposal to name the street where the American Embassy is in Johannesburg from Sandton Drive to Leila Khaled Drive. They wanted to force Americans to use the name of a known terrorist on their letter heads and official documents. The ANC is of course in love with tyrants and their modus operandi is not only erasing the past, and controlling history through propaganda…they are always honouring or glorifying terrorism. And therefore I reject any and all of their name changes.

Number 9 – Reconciliation and Ubuntu

Ubuntu...Another one of those hypocritical


collectivist, communist concepts. Often translated as “humanity towards others” or “I am because we are.”. Apparently It’s a philosophy of interconnectedness, compassion, and community — emphasizing that an individual’s well-being is tied to the well-being of others. Satanic Red, promiscuous, polygamist harem hoarder, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and his mass-murdering sidekick, Nelson Mandela often spoke about Ubuntu as a guiding principle for reconciliation and nation-building in South Africa. That alone should make anybody reject it. Over the last 30 years it has become clear that whites are not part of the “us” in the Ubuntu community. Ubuntu is a black thing that excludes whites and anybody else who is not, 1) Black 2) Communist and 3) Corrupt and on the take. Ubuntu is just a glorified word for ANC nepotism.

Besides the ANC and their followers had a chance to reconciliate with whites at the TRC (Truth and Reconciliation Committee) back in 1996. It became a one-sided farce and witch hunt also known as the Des and Alex show after Desmond Tutu and Alex Borrainne.

It became clear that the ANC was more interrested in retribution than in reconcilliation. To this day they refuse to condemn the songs and chants like Kill the Boer;Kill the farmer.

As far as I am concerned; there can never be and will never be any true reconciliation in this country.

Number 10 – The New holidays

The old South Africa was a Godfearing country


with mostly religious holidays. Over time that changed due to Communist “Liberation Theology” and the churches such as the Methodists, Presbyterians, Baptists, etc all started moving to the Leftist ecumenical universal rubbish and started holding services with heathens and religions incompatible to Christianity. Worst was that some of the biggest churches such as the Catholics, Anglicans and the Dutch Reform Church that was the de facto State Church at the time, all started to support a new god…God Mandela and supporting his demonic Marxist terrorist scum dressed up as angels. Along with abandoning the majority of the religious holidays, were abandoned white cultural holidays such as Founder’s Day (Van Riebeeck’s day), Kruger Day and the Day of the Vow. That in itself was a tragedy for me, but worse was what they replaced these holidays with; meaningless Communist rubbish such as Freedom Day, Youth Day, Workers Day, Family Day, Human Rights Day, Heritage Day…Not sure exactly what they are celebrating on those days because all I see is the ANC undermining every single one of those concepts, freedom, human rights, families, heritage… especially of the whites. I still celebrate only the old holidays and reject the ANC holidays with the contempt it deserves. I always send messages of congratulation to my friends and family members on Kruger’s Day, Van Riebeeck’s day and the Day of the Vow. I still keep the religious holidays such as Easter, ascension day, Pentecost, etc.

 

 

Monday, 22 September 2025

Rewarding terrorists by recognizing Palestine

 


By Mike Smith

22 September 2025

A few years ago, under South Africa’s Apartheid system, the whites of South Africa thought that the only solution for the cultural diversity of South Africa would be to have a “Two-state-solution” and created the Bantu Homelands. Eventually ten of these autonomous nation states were created, and the government of South Africa declared that four of the South African Bantustans were independent, but the world refused to recognise them.

There are many lies about this system. Today children are taught in schools that the Homelands/Bantustans were on the worst, most infertile land with no minerals after the whites first made sure they secured all the mineral wealth for themselves, denied blacks state protection, etc..

All the major tribes of South Africa such as the Zulus, the Sothos, Tswanas, Swazis, Xhosas and Vendas were given the chance to rule and govern themselves on land that they have historically settled themselves…plus some more. Most of this land was in the fertile eastern part of the country and as can be seen by the biggest Platinum mine in the world, it was in Bophuthatswana.

In my book I showed and proved how the 1913 Natives Land Act gave black South Africans 65% more land than they originally settled and claimed.

The Xhosas got two countries (Transkei and Ciskei).

The Sothos, who already had their own country Lesotho, further received QwaQwa.

The Swazis, who already had their own Kingdom, Swaziland, further received KaNgwane

The Tswanas, who already had their own country Botswana, further received Bophuthatswana.

Often, white farms were expropriated to form black homelands as in the case of KwaNdebele where 19 white farms were combined to form the Bantustan.

As for protection…The South Africans trained their civil services, their police and their armies for them. To provide blacks with work, white South Africans were given tax incentives if they started factories or businesses in the Bantustans. Whites built hospitals, schools and universities for these homelands.

Sixty years down the line, these Homelands are now ALL incorporated in Greater South Africa and in ANC governed territory…ALL a failure.

The hypocrisy and double standards of the Western World really make me sick. Sometimes I honestly think they have all gone bonkers. What they saw back then as “racial oppression” is fully praised as the “Two-state-solution” in Israel today. Back then they didn’t want to recognise and acknowledge the independence of these South African nations, but today they want to recognise and acknowledge the independence of the Palestinian nation.

I don’t want to get into a debate about whether Palestinians should get another separate country. As a true nationalist I believe every nation should be able to rule themselves if they so desire. Self-determination of People is even in the UN Charter.

Therefore I, for one, fully support a homeland for the Zulu Nation if they so desire…provided they do not already have one.

For instance, the Tswanas (Botswana and Bophuhatswana), the Xhosas (Transkei and Ciskei), Matabeles have Matabeleland in Zimbabwe, yet they received KwaNdebele in South Africa too…exactly how many independent countries do you need for one nation?

The same with the Palestinians. The name of the West Bank is called, “West Jordan land” in German. Why? Because Jordan is the country of Palestinians. In Jordan there are 12 million people who speak exactly the same language and dialect as the Palestinians, have exactly the same culture and religion as them, yet the West wants to recognise a “Palestinian State” in addition to what they already have.

Seriously, I don’t understand what they are trying to achieve. They are rewarding Islamic terrorists. It is all I can think of. Maybe they are trying to claim a moral high ground. Who knows what is going on their sick minds.

All I can say is that I will NEVER recognise a Palestinian state. Just like I do not recognise the ANC as a legitimate government. They are Marxist terrorist scum and that is what they will always be. No wonder the ANC and Hamas are big buddies. Birds of a feather who are in love with tyrants.

Monday, 15 September 2025

Charlie Kirk - What the Looney Left cannot debate, they want to kill

 


By Mike Smith

15 September 2025 

Last week, the conservative activist, Charlie Kirk, the founder and executive director of Turning Point US” was assassinated by a deranged and perversed, 22-year-old patsy called Tyler James Robinson.

Tyler James Robinson joined the club of the notorious “Three-named-assassins” such as John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated President Abraham Lincoln, Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin of President John F. Kennedy, James Earl Ray who killed Martin Luther King Jr., Thomas Matthew Crooks who shot President Trump’s ear and Mark David Chapman, who murdered John Lennon.

As Homer J. Simpson used to say, “It is too much of a coincidence to be a coincidence.”

There is of course an ancient esoteric, occult and hermetic connection to the power of three. The Threefold Law of Return is a spiritual principle, particularly in Wicca and other Pagan paths, stating that any energy, action, or intent sent out into the world will return to the sender, often magnified threefold, whether positive or negativeThis concept emphasizes personal accountability, as actions, thoughts, and deeds contribute to one's own karmic balance.

Following the death of Charlie Kirk there was a significant amount of bad energy put out by the Looney Left. Sickening bad energy…And where I don’t usually wish bad things on anybody, I know that the Left will eventually get their just deserts.

If we want to see positive change in this world in our time, we should all do what Charlie Kirk did.