Controlled Opposition: a strategy in which an individual, organization, or movement is covertly controlled or influenced by a 3rd party and the controlled entity’s true purpose is something other than its publicly stated purpose. The controlled entity serves a role of mass deception, surveillance and/or political/social manipulation. In most cases the controlled party is portrayed as being in opposition to the interests of the controlling party.
By Mike Smith
26 February 2025
I see that a self-appointed Soliforum group pretending to be representatives of Afrikaners (with no mandate) have posted and boasted of visiting the White House to go and cry on President Donald Trump’s shoulder again.
I wonder what the Americans thought of these whimpy Afrikaners (and I don’t mean the Burger restaurant people)?
People will know from my previous blog that I have a huge problem with “Boereverneukers” and conmen in general. It comes from my acute awareness and studies of Communism. Therefore I have no time for Soliforum and I will explain to you why.
One thing about Communists is that they lack originality. Everything is borrowed or stolen.
It is the same from Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” to the Polish “Solidarity” movement from the 1980’s under the so-called “anti-communist” hero, Lech Walesa.
That is where South Africa’s “Solidarity” borrowed their name from. Polish “Solidarity”.
Just the word “Solidarity” already sounds Socialist. It has its roots in “Collectivism”, just like Fascism and Communism.
Forensic handwriting experts from The Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), who also prosecuted Nazi criminals, had no doubt after they analyzed documents, agreements and receipts where Lech Walesa personally signed and wrote in his own handwriting that he was working with the Communist secret police from 1970 to 1976.
The IPN experts compared the signature on the papers they had found with the former president's handwriting, they looked at Walesa's passport application, identity card and driver's license. Walesa himself refused to provide any writing samples and of course Walesa denied the allegations and called it a secret police forgery and an opposition conspiracy to frame him, but the way he acted throughout shows a different pattern.
Lenin apparently said – “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
Fake, controlled opposition is nothing new. Policemen use the “bad-cop-good-cop” method and lawyers/prosecutors use it to suck clients dry, especially divorcees.
In the French Revolution, Count Mirabeau was part of the Controlled opposition, because although everyone thought he was supporting the revolution, in reality he supported the monarchy and was a personal friend of the king. He was a government agent.
In Operation Trust, the objective of the Bolsheviks was to create a controlled opposition to entrap the remnents of the supporters of the Russian Monarchy.
In Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel was a kind of Manchurian Candidate; a Commie to the core pretending to be a conservative politician, who ultimately destroyed Germany.
Again, Like Walesa she denied and downplayed her role in the Communist Youth (FDJ) and denied being a Stasi Agent called IM “Erika” (IM stood for Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter or unofficial collaborator), but the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. She comes from a Nomenklatura family with high ties and membership to the SED (Commie Party), she travelled abroad to Russia and twice to the West, she was allowed to study Physics…all these privileges were reserved only for Party members.
After Apartheid we saw how the state’s “National Intelligence” used the same methods to entrap and eliminate the Right-Wing by creating fake honey-trap organisations such as the “Boeremag”.
Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries.
For politicians of a Totalitarian Regime Fake Opposition has many uses. First it gives the impression of freedom of speech and thought; tolerance to opposition. At times the fake opposition can be vilified, at others used as guides.
These Communists are extremely sly and devious in the way they operate.
Real opposition will simply be eliminated. Fake opposition is always pretending to be honourable and on your side. Pretending to oppose the regime, but secretly working against you and FOR the regime to ultimately finish you off.
Therefore it is not easy to spot fake opposition. It takes a trained eye, to read them between the lines and spot the signs.
Look at SoliForum:
1. They pretend to represent Afrikaners and Afrikaner interests yet they attacked singer/activist Steve Hofmeyer and called him a racist for singing “Die Stem”.
2. They vehemently do not support a homeland for the Afrikaners
3. At the same time they do not support emigration of Afrikaners
4. They support pressure against the ANC, but not the removal of the ANC.
5. They don’t want to create or oppose the ANC’s policies, just steer them correctly.
6. They don’t oppose the racist ANC policies such as Affirmative Action, they just want these policies implemented “fairly”…See Dr. Dirk Herman’s booklet, “Affirmative Action: a guide to good practice”.
It basically approves of Affirmative Action and offers the ANC a few tips on how to introduce it “fairly” so as not to upset the white Afrikaners. I mean, come on…“Fair Affirmative Action” is like saying there is “fair racism” or “fair rape”.
Oh, we don’t oppose genocide, as long as it is done “fairly”.
Soliforum is forever hacking away at the branches of the weeds, but never attacks the roots. They just trim the branches so that the weeds don’t look so bad…like putting sparkles on a turd.
They will have a “Helping hand” organisation helping poor Afrikaners with food parcels…all fair and well, but what is the ROOT CAUSE of why those Afrikaners are poor in the first place? The ANC with their policies of Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment.
Soliforum will build a technical College for white Afrikaners, but will not attack the reason why they had to build one…namely the ANC’s racist quota system in university entry and their constant meddling in Afrikaner schools and learning institutions.
Flip Buys, back in 2015 wrote a victim blaming article called, “Give our children hope for the future”.
According to Buys, the white South Africans who are raising the alarm about the ongoing genocide against white farmers and whites in general are depriving our youth of hope for a future in SA. That is right…we (says Buys)…the ones with the “Hysterical racist screams (on Facebook)” and “Skewed panic-propaganda” of “White genocide and whites being excluded from the job market” are the ones who are going to drive the young people out of the country.
Not the ANC, not their racist policies of Affirmative Action, BEE, quotas in sport and university entry…not the horrific crimes like farm murders and torture, nor the corruption and mismanagement by the ANC…no…WE, the racist bloggers, activists and whistle-blowers are the problem. We make the youngsters lose hope.
What an idiot. Since when is “Hope” a strategy?
Nevertheless, continued Buys with a metaphor about arriving at an accident scene. We who raise the alarm are just like the people at a car accident crying and screaming about how much blood there is, but we don’t help to stop the bleeding… …So what is Solidarity doing then? Stopping the bleeding? Sorry, but no amount of Band-Aid plasters they stick on is going to stop the haemorrhaging caused by the accident either. Who or what caused the accident?
No comments:
Post a Comment